Systemic therapy, survival and end-of-life costs for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: retrospective SEER-Medicare study of women age ≥65 years.

Aim: To analyze therapy for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC), factors contributing to survival and costs. Patients & methods: Using 2010-2016 SEER-Medicare data, we identified women (≥65 years) with mTNBC. Results: Of 302 eligible patients, 152 (50%) received systemic therapy. In multivariable regression analyses, only age <75 years was associated with therapy receipt (odds ratio: 2.91; 95% CI: 1.79-4.74); and only systemic therapy significantly reduced risk of death (hazard ratio: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.26-0.44). Median overall survival was 13.4 (95% CI: 11.3-15.1) vs 3.3 months (95% CI: 2.7-3.9) in therapy vs no-therapy cohorts. Mean per-patient-per-month costs <30 days before end-of-life/follow-up were $14,100 and $15,600 (2019 USD), respectively. Conclusion: Poor outcomes and high costs indicate need for more effective mTNBC therapy.

Association of 21-Gene Assay (OncotypeDX) Testing and Receipt of Chemotherapy in the Medicare Breast Cancer Patient Population Following Initial Adoption.

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to investigate why early studies regarding adoption of the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay did not show an initial reduction in the number of patients with breast cancer receiving real-world chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We addressed 2 sources of confounding suspected in previous studies: (1) the early time frame during the initial adoption phase of the RS assay, and (2) suspected selective, increased administration to patients more likely to have been chemotherapy candidates. To address selective use during initial adoption, we used updated SEER-Medicare data from 2004 and 2011. To address individual selection bias, we examined whether RS test utilization was negatively associated with rates of local chemotherapy use assessed at the hospital referral region level using conventional ordinary least squares and instrumental variable approaches to adjust for selection bias. RESULTS: A total of 26,009 patients met inclusion criteria. Assay use was associated with a decrease in absolute percentage use of chemotherapy of 4.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.2%-5.7%), which was even more pronounced in sensitivity analyses limited to later study years (2008-2011), with a decrease of 6.8% (95% CI, 5.3%-8.3%). Instrumental variable models yielded similar point estimates but were insufficiently powered to draw conclusions. CONCLUSION: Receipt of the 21-gene assay was associated with decreased utilization of chemotherapy by 2008.

Understanding breast cancer survivors' financial burden and distress after financial assistance.

PURPOSE: Little is known about how breast cancer may impact survivors' financial well-being. This study aims to investigate the financial status, burden, and opinions of breast cancer survivors who received short-term financial assistance, emotional support, and resource navigation from a community organization during treatment. METHODS: Clients previously served by the community organization were mailed a 16-question survey (n = 751) to elicit their perspective on financial status and burden before, during, and after diagnosis and treatment along with general demographic and opinion items. RESULTS: 136 surveys (18.1%) were returned yielding 118 (15.7%) suitable for analyses. Clients' average age was 54.3 years. Most were female (99.2%), Caucasian (66.1%), and diagnosed with Stage 1 or 2 breast cancer (58.5%). Clients reported significantly worse (p < 0.001) financial status after being diagnosed compared to before diagnosis. Financial distress was highest during cancer treatment (mean = 3.92, SD = 0.85), lowest prior to treatment (mean = 2.48, SD = 1.05), and remained high after treatment (mean = 3.59, SD = 1.05). Those with higher distress after treatment were significantly (p = 0.01) more likely to report lower social support during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer survivors reported worsening financial status and distress after being diagnosed and during treatment despite receiving short-term financial assistance, emotional support, and resource navigation. Survivors' financial distress after treatment remained higher than before treatment. However, most felt receiving financial assistance improved their quality of life and made them feel more in control of financial decision-making. Breast cancer survivors who feel they have low social support during treatment may feel higher financial distress posttreatment.

Drug cost avoidance in clinical trials of breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to determine if clinical trials in breast cancer, with an investigational drug, created direct drug cost savings for the healthcare system related to cost avoidance of the best standard of care treatments used in these studies. The aim was to quantify this potential drug cost avoidance. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of the drug cost avoidance during the study period (2014-2016). We included clinical trials with investigational drug, managed by pharmacy department and provided by the sponsor. The patients included had a therapeutic alternative defined as standard treatment that should have been received in case of not participating in the clinical trial. Direct cost savings, to national healthcare system, associated to clinical trials were calculated. RESULTS: Thirty-seven clinical trials with a total of 89 breast cancer patients were included in the study. A total of 62.2% were phase III and 75.7% belonged to the pharmaceutical industry. They provided a total cost avoidance of 957,246€ (1,130,028$), an average cost avoidance per patient of 10,756€ (12,697$). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that those clinical trials in which investigational drug are provided or refunded by the sponsor provide substantial cost savings. Due to the shortage of published articles that calculate the cost avoided in medication, we cannot compare directly the results obtained in the different institutions.

History of Breast Cancer Increases 90-Day Pulmonary Embolism Rates and Reimbursements After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A National Matched-Pair Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Rates of total hip arthroplasty (THA) are projected to increase in the coming decades. Multiple studies have focused on identifying risk factors for adverse events after joint arthroplasty, and recent attention has been directed toward cancer. Very limited data have been published examining the effects of history of malignancy on outcomes after THA. With a concomitant increase in breast cancer diagnosis and treatments in recent years, it is expected that orthopedic surgeons will likely see more breast cancer survivors in clinic. The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of a personal history of breast cancer on 90-day outcomes after THA. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case-control study of the entire Medicare records. The endpoints of this study included length of stay, medical complications, surgical complications, and costs (examined here as reimbursements). Patients were matched by age and gender in order to decrease confounding. A 1:1 matching was performed. RESULTS: After age and demographics matching, our findings demonstrated that patients with a history of breast cancer have increased rates of pulmonary embolism (0.59% vs 0.45%, P = .003), increased use of chest computed tomography (1.72% vs 1.18%, P < .001), and higher mean 90-day reimbursements (mean $15,432 vs mean $14,701, P = .011) in the 90 days following surgery. Other medical and surgical complications were equally distributed in both cohorts. CONCLUSION: Surgeons should be aware of the increased rate of pulmonary embolism and have a more aggressive thromboprophylaxis protocol in these patients.

The challenge of rapid diagnosis in oncology: Diagnostic accuracy and cost analysis of a large-scale one-stop breast clinic.

PURPOSE: Rapid diagnosis is a key issue in modern oncology, for which one-stop breast clinics are a model. We aimed to assess the diagnosis accuracy and procedure costs of a large-scale one-stop breast clinic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 10,602 individuals with suspect breast lesions attended the Gustave Roussy's regional one-stop breast clinic between 2004 and 2012. The multidisciplinary clinic uses multimodal imaging together with ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration for masses and ultrasonography-guided and stereotactic biopsies as needed. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by comparing one-stop diagnosis to the consolidated diagnosis obtained after surgery or biopsy or long-term monitoring. The medical cost per patient of the care pathway was assessed from patient-level data collected prospectively. RESULTS: Sixty-nine percent of the patients had masses, while 31% had micro-calcifications or other non-mass lesions. In 75% of the cases (87% of masses), an exact diagnosis could be given on the same day. In the base-case analysis (i.e. considering only benign and malignant lesions at one-stop and at consolidated diagnoses), the sensitivity of the one-stop clinic was 98.4%, specificity 99.8%, positive and negative predictive values 99.7% and 99.0%. In the sensitivity analysis (reclassification of suspect, atypical and undetermined lesions), diagnostic sensitivity varied from 90.3% to 98.5% and specificity varied from 94.3% to 99.8%. The mean medical cost per patient of one-stop diagnostic procedure was €420. CONCLUSIONS: One-stop breast clinic can provide timely and cost-efficient delivery of highly accurate diagnoses and serve as models of care for multiple settings, including rapid screening-linked diagnosis.

Private Payer's Status Improves Male Breast Cancer Survival.

Survival from male breast cancer is influenced by many factors. This study assessed payer's status effect on survival of male breast cancer patients. This study included 8,828 male breast cancer patients diagnosed between 1998-2006 and followed to 2011 in the National Cancer Data Base. Cox regression was used to investigate the effect of payer's status and other factors on overall survival. Patients had 36.2%, 42.7%, 14.7%, and 6.5% of stage I to IV cancer, respectively. Payer status was private 47.7%, Medicare 42.6%, Medicaid 3.24%, unknown 3.59%, and uninsured 2.95%. Median overall survival (MOS) for all patients was 10.6 years. In multivariate analysis, Direct adjusted MOS was 12.46, 11.89, 9.99, 9.02, and 8.29 years for private, "unknown," Medicare, uninsured, and Medicaid payer's status, respectively. Patients with private and "unknown" payer's status showed a significant difference in survival compared to uninsured patients, while Medicaid and Medicare patients did not. Age, race, stage, grade, income, comorbidity, distance travelled, and diagnosing/treating facility were also significant predictors of survival. Treatment delay and cancer program did not have a significant influence on survival.

Modeling the impact of comorbidity on breast cancer patient outcomes.

The objective of this paper is to model the impact of comorbidity on breast cancer patient outcomes (e.g., length of stay and disposition). Previous studies suggest that comorbidities may significantly affect mortality risks for breast cancer patients. The 2006 AHRQ Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) is used to analyze the relationships among comorbidities (e.g., hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and mental disorder), total charges, length of stay, and patient disposition as a function of age and race. A multifaceted approach is used to quantify these relationships. A causal study is performed to explore the effect of various comorbidities on patient outcomes. Least squares regression models are developed to evaluate and compare significant factors that influence total charges and length of stay. Logistic regression is used to study the factors that may cause patient mortality or transferring. In addition, different survival models are developed to study the impact of comorbidity on length of stay with censoring information. This study shows the interactions and relationship among various comorbidities and breast cancer. It shows that certain hypertension may not increase length of stay and total charges; diabetes behaves differently among general population and breast cancer patients; mental disorder has an impact on patient disposition that affects true length of stay and charges, and obesity may have limited effect on patient outcomes. Moreover, this study will help to better understand the expenditure patterns for population subgroups with several chronic conditions and to quantify the impact of comorbidities on patient outcomes. Lastly, it also provides insight for breast cancer patients with comorbidities as a function of age and race.

Accurate and cost-effective evaluation of breast masses in males.

BACKGROUND: Because the majority of breast masses in males are benign and need not be excised if asymptomatic, we studied the combination of physical examination (PE) and fine needle aspiration (FNA), with or without mammography, as a diagnostic alternative to routine surgical biopsy of these lesions. METHODS: A diagnostic test study and cost-effectiveness analysis was performed in three participating multidisciplinary breast clinics, involving a consecutive sample of 51 males with unilateral breast masses. Each lesion was tested with both PE and FNA; 13 were also studied with mammography, and each test was scored as benign or suspicious. Lesions for which all tests were benign were followed up clinically (mean 19 months). Lesions for which any test was suspicious were excised. RESULTS: All tests were benign in 38 cases. No cancers developed at the index sites during follow-up of these lesions, including 8 excisional biopsies done for symptoms (negative predictive value and specificity 100%). Open biopsy confirmed malignancy in all 6 cases for which all tests were suspicious (positive predictive value and sensitivity 100%). In all 7 cases where the tests were not in agreement, open biopsy was benign. In these cases FNA (2 false positives) proved more accurate than PE (5 false positives). Mammography added no additional diagnostic information to the combination of PE and FNA. Compared with routine open biopsy, the combination of PE and FNA avoided surgical biopsy in 30 of the 51 lesions, and was associated with an average decrease in charges of up to $510 per case. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of PE and FNA for the evaluation of breast masses in males is diagnostically accurate and results in a reduction in patient charges compared with routine open biopsy.